Mail and Parcel Delivery · Illinois

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta

Chicago, IL · ~54 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta runs at 479% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta: 21.5 TCR = 479% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta safety composite

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2017→2022

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta injury rate improved

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta's TCR fell 6.0 from 28.1 in 2017 to 22.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 28.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=28.1 · 2018=21.8 · 2019=23.4 · 2020=19.8 · 2021=14.2 · 2022=22.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.5 · 479% of ind

  • DART 22.1 DART
  • RANK #591/599
  • PHOTO 230412-BAL-HAMILTON …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 230412-BAL-HAMILTON STA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta averages 21.5 TCR (479% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta TCR series: 2017=28.1 · 2018=21.8 · 2019=23.4 · 2020=19.8 · 2021=14.2 · 2022=22.1 · BLS 4.5

Where 161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #591 safest of 599 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Illinois.

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta (54 employees, TCR 21.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta
161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta (54 employees, TCR 21.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

161568-Chi-Nancy B Jefferson Sta has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 22.1 22.1 9 1 0
2021 14.2 12.2 7 0 0
2020 19.8 19.8 10 0 0
2019 23.4 23.4 11 0 0
2018 21.8 21.8 10 0 0
2017 28.1 28.1 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · IL · Chicago

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 230412-BAL-HAMILTON STA 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 284231-KCM-JAMES CREWS STA 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR STORM LAKE_1383690 21.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 072344-DEN-PARK HILL STA 21.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Illinois Crop Improvement Association, Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illinois Electric Cooperative 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenlink Energy Solutions, Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE POINTCORE Construction, LLC 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Highland Township Fire Department 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Seafood City Supermarket - Henderson 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Snyir Inc. 21.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MTW Industries, Inc. 21.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 218580-Thibodaux Po 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 266480-Moorhead Po 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 210630-Btr-Istrouma Sta 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 217953-Shv-Lynbrook Sta 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.