Mail and Parcel Delivery · California

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx

Van Nuys, CA · ~138 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade A.

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx: 1.8 TCR = 40% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx safety composite

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2022

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx injury rate improved

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.9 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Van Nuys, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 40% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #46/1240
  • PHOTO SOUTH BRUNSWICK_1438…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SOUTH BRUNSWICK_1438258 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx averages 1.8 TCR (40% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.5 · BLS 4.5

Where 058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 1240 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in California.

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx (138 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx
058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx (138 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2017 2.9 1.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · CA · Van Nuys

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 192 employers in Van Nuys, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SOUTH BRUNSWICK_1438258 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAMBRIAN PARK_1356702 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SANGER_1380732 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FORT SCOTT_1363839 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westerlay Orchids LP 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danell Custom Harvesting LLC - DCH629 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Labor Solutions, Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLH Fire Protection 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Presbyterian Hospital 1,686 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-048 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-063 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR VAN NUYS HUB (CAVAN) 864 FTE
NAT-TCR Mn Gastro Coon Rapids 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SPI - WS - Colorado 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gambrinus Roller Plant 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6299-MN003 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greif Alsip Sd 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9277-127 Vbcrp 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE 564989-Madison Main Carrier Anx 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE 259792-Way-Westland Br 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.