Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids

Coon Rapids, MN · ~60 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids: 1.8 TCR = 47% of Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids safety composite

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2022

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Coon Rapids, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 47% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #70/419
  • PHOTO N Olmsted Med Ofc Bldg
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: N Olmsted Med Ofc Bldg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mn Gastro Coon Rapids averages 1.8 TCR (47% of the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Mn Gastro Coon Rapids falls in its industry

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices ( establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 419 Gastroenterologists' offices ( employers in Minnesota.

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids (60 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mn Gastro Coon Rapids
Mn Gastro Coon Rapids (60 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mn Gastro Coon Rapids has more employees than the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., cent median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Coon Rapids

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 155 employers in Coon Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR N Olmsted Med Ofc Bldg 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gundersen - Sparta Clinic 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haugen OBGYN - Edina 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 97-77 Queens Blvd 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Living Greens Farm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sweden Dairy 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Customer Service Support 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Cities Specialties 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital 2,851 FTE
CITY-NEAR rms Company 1,058 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coon Rapids Customer Exp Ctr 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Coon Rapids 401 FTE
NAT-TCR SPI - WS - Colorado 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 058105-Van Nuys Fss Mail Processing Anx 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gambrinus Roller Plant 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Cleaning Guys, LLC. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbia Crest Estate Vineyards #10 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 119 FAMILY FARE -Byron Center, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1920 VGS -Howell, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 542507-Edm-Perrinville Sta 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.