Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · California

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse

Fresno, CA · ~329 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade B.

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse: 2.6 TCR = 76% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse safety composite

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse: 1.6 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2022

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.6 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Fresno, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #4/156
  • PHOTO 154 - E 96th St Ind…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~329 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 154 - E 96th St Indianapolis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse averages 2.6 TCR (76% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.1 · BLS 3.4

Where 0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 156 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in California.

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse (329 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse
0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse (329 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.1 1.4 6 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 8 0 0
2020 1.9 0.4 5 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 9 0 0
2018 3.5 2.7 9 0 0
2017 1.6 1.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · CA · Fresno

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 154 - E 96th St Indianapolis 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 705-00840 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 055 - Van Dyke Ave Sterling Ht 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 660-00670 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farming 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPAN Construction and Engineering 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterson Brothers Construction, Inc 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lagunitas Brewing Co. 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond North Dartmouth 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sherrington (#143) 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Msd, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Transport Corporation - Greensboro 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Geneseo 026 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE 180 East Fifth 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE Presbyterian Northside 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. 329 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.