Power transformers, electric, manufacturing · North Carolina

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc.

Goldsboro, NC · ~329 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Power transformers, electric, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 47% of Power transformers, electric, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. safety composite

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2021

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. injury rate improved

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.8 from 2.2 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335311 · Goldsboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Midwest Electrical T…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~329 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Midwest Electrical Transformer Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (47% of the Power transformers, electric, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. falls in its industry

141 Power transformers, electric, establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Power transformers, electric, employers in North Carolina.

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. (329 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc.
SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. (329 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6

SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. has more employees than the Power transformers, electric, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.4 1.1 5 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 4 0 0
2016 2.2 1.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335311 · NC · Goldsboro

141 Power transformers, electric, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 145 employers in Goldsboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Midwest Electrical Transformer Services 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : LIPB 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Energy USA, inc. Earth City 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Bern Mill 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4458 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1179 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greensboro Blend Plant 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cherry Hospital 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Wayne - All 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR O'Berry Neuro Medical Treatment Center 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR AP Emissions 422 FTE
NAT-TCR Americold West Memphis, AR 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chemical Transportation, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Edmonton Plant 4 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Erie Electric - Akron Division 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sutter Medical Center Sacramento (110-2301) 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE Presbyterian Northside 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE MedCare Ambulance 329 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0657 - North Fresno Ca Whse 329 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.