Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · California

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse

Lancaster, CA · ~368 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse: 6.6 TCR = 194% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse safety composite

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2017→2022

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse injury rate improved

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse's TCR fell 7.7 from 13.0 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.0 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 194% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #120/156
  • PHOTO 1006 - SELMA TX WHSE
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 105 inj
  • SIZE ~368 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1006 - SELMA TX WHSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse averages 6.6 TCR (194% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse TCR series: 2017=13 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=5 · 2021=5 · 2022=5.3 · BLS 3.4

Where 0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #120 safest of 156 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in California.

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse (368 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse
0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse (368 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0762 - Lancaster Ca Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.3 5.0 16 0 0
2021 5.0 4.7 14 0 0
2020 5.0 5.0 13 0 0
2019 5.1 5.1 13 0 0
2018 6.2 5.1 16 0 0
2017 13.0 12.3 33 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · CA · Lancaster

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1006 - SELMA TX WHSE 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320038 AUBURN, MA 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0342 - NAPERVILLE IL WHSE 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320100 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Service Champions 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tropicale Foods LLC 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ms Aerospace, Inc. 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE K01 AER - Oceanside 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR 1006 - Selma Tx Whse 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wegmans Raleigh 108 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pace 2 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Meridian At Waterways 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0485 - Waipio Hi Whse 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0095 - Tacoma Wa Whse 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE B54 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE YMCA of Greater Erie 368 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.