Correctional institutions · California

California State Prison-Los Angeles County

Lancaster, CA · ~1,505 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

California State Prison-Los Angeles County runs at 579% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

California State Prison-Los Angeles County: 18.5 TCR = 579% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

California State Prison-Los Angeles County safety composite

California State Prison-Los Angeles County scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2017→2018

California State Prison-Los Angeles County injury rate improved

California State Prison-Los Angeles County's TCR fell 6.5 from 21.8 in 2017 to 15.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 21.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=21.8 · 2018=15.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 18.5 · 579% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #63/73
  • PHOTO California Rehabilit…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 517 inj
  • SIZE ~1,505 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Rehabilitation Center (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

California State Prison-Los Angeles County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows California State Prison-Los Angeles County averages 18.5 TCR (579% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

California State Prison-Los Angeles County TCR series: 2017=21.8 · 2018=15.3 · BLS 3.2

Where California State Prison-Los Angeles County falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 73 Correctional institutions employers in California.

California State Prison-Los Angeles County (1,505 employees, TCR 18.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate California State Prison-Los Angeles County
California State Prison-Los Angeles County (1,505 employees, TCR 18.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

California State Prison-Los Angeles County has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 15.3 2.4 233 1 0
2017 21.8 7.0 284 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · CA · Lancaster

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Rehabilitation Center 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDC Los Angeles 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gus Harrison Correctional Facility 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDC MULE CREEK STATE PRISON 18.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ANAHEIM (CAANA) 1,506 FTE
STATE-SIZE WAWONA PACKING COMPANY 1,503 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOLV Energy, LLC 1,507 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burlington 1,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - Kensington 596 FTE
NAT-TCR Braxton Creek RV, LLC 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Avalon Health & Rehabilitation 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Palleton of Fremont 18.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Rockford 18.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Intralox LLC 1,505 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCA Florida West Hospital 1,505 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ventana Medical Systems 1,505 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advance NC Facility 1,504 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.