Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors · Maryland

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire

Jessup, MD · ~63 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire: 4.7 TCR = 168% of Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire safety composite

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2016→2024

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire injury rate improved

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire's TCR fell 9.2 from 9.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=2.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Jessup, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 168% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #87/121
  • PHOTO Bestler Corp.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bestler Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0d52 - Washington Dc Fire averages 4.7 TCR (168% of the Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where 0d52 - Washington Dc Fire falls in its industry

5,793 Plumbing, Heating and Air Cond establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 121 Plumbing, Heating and Air Cond employers in Maryland.

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire (63 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 0d52 - Washington Dc Fire
0d52 - Washington Dc Fire (63 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

0d52 - Washington Dc Fire has more employees than the Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning C median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 4 0 0
2021 8.2 8.2 5 0 0
2020 8.7 7.0 5 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2016 9.2 9.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MD · Jessup

5,793 Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 122 employers in Jessup, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bestler Corp. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR A. Hattersley & Sons, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR K&I SHEET METAL INC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR North shore mechanical contractors 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE DPL-Centreville 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viskon-Aire Coporation 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lighting Retrofit International 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster Foods 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jessup Correctional Institution 530 FTE
CITY-NEAR RNDC Jessup 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Baltimore, LLC 491 FTE
NAT-TCR Spooner Clinic 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dutch's Masonry 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0800 - College Station 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1140 - Rancho San Diego 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peoria Landscaping 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cushions to Go Pontotoc 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE 779 - Boston Fas 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterile Processing Services of America, LLC 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.