Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maryland

Spring Arbor of Severna Park

Severna Park, MD · ~63 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spring Arbor of Severna Park runs at 417% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Spring Arbor of Severna Park: 15.8 TCR = 417% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spring Arbor of Severna Park safety composite

Spring Arbor of Severna Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Spring Arbor of Severna Park: 15.5 → 17.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 17.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Spring Arbor of Severna Park's TCR rose 2.0 from 15.5 in 2022 to 17.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Severna Park, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.8 · 417% of ind

  • DART 17.5 DART
  • RANK #73/79
  • PHOTO Fircrest Senior Living
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fircrest Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Spring Arbor of Severna Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spring Arbor of Severna Park averages 15.8 TCR (417% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spring Arbor of Severna Park TCR series: 2022=15.5 · 2023=14.6 · 2024=17.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Spring Arbor of Severna Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 79 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Spring Arbor of Severna Park (63 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Spring Arbor of Severna Park
Spring Arbor of Severna Park (63 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Spring Arbor of Severna Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.5 17.5 11 0 0
2023 14.6 13.1 10 0 0
2022 15.5 12.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MD · Severna Park

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 23 employers in Severna Park, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fircrest Senior Living 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Falcon Point Labor, LLC 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living - Flagstaff 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspirations of Mount Washington 15.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DPL-Centreville 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viskon-Aire Coporation 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lighting Retrofit International 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD1526-BVSL-BV SEVERNA PARK 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bernward Mechanical and Construction Solutions 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brightview Severna Park 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT 358 140 FTE
NAT-TCR Village of East Dundee 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Shawono Ctr - Dhhs 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Orwar - Warrenton Center 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CO013SWP 15.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dream Logistics 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Campbellsville Industries, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bellettini 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE 540-FC261 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.