Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Maryland

1000 - Columbia Md Whse

Elkridge, MD · ~311 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1000 - Columbia Md Whse runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

1000 - Columbia Md Whse: 6.4 TCR = 189% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1000 - Columbia Md Whse safety composite

1000 - Columbia Md Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2022

1000 - Columbia Md Whse injury rate improved

1000 - Columbia Md Whse's TCR fell 1.0 from 6.9 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.9 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Elkridge, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 189% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #21/30
  • PHOTO 2532-25320064
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~311 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2532-25320064 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

1000 - Columbia Md Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1000 - Columbia Md Whse averages 6.4 TCR (189% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1000 - Columbia Md Whse TCR series: 2017=6.9 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6 · BLS 3.4

Where 1000 - Columbia Md Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 30 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Maryland.

1000 - Columbia Md Whse (311 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 1000 - Columbia Md Whse
1000 - Columbia Md Whse (311 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

1000 - Columbia Md Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.0 6.0 15 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 8 0 0
2020 5.1 3.8 12 0 0
2019 9.2 8.8 20 0 0
2018 7.8 7.3 16 1 0
2017 6.9 6.5 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · MD · Elkridge

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 90 employers in Elkridge, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320064 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0664 - EAST PLANO TX WHSE 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0227 - NEWINGTON VA WHSE 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1004 - NORTHEAST SAN JOSE CA WHSE 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lifestar Response of Maryland, Inc. - Annapolis Junction Base 311 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEWAS 311 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bakery Express - Mid Atlantic 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1142 - Towson 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bell Nursery - Store Employees 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SMD1 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Executive Maintenance, Inc. 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Center for Social Change 419 FTE
NAT-TCR 0227 - Newington Va Whse 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0664 - East Plano Tx Whse 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Life Care Center of Raynham 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction Office 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0380 - Lincoln Park Il Whse 311 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utilities 311 FTE
NAT-SIZE VA-Portsmouth 311 FTE
NAT-SIZE F & M Manchester Service Center 311 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.