Passenger air transportation, scheduled · Missouri

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar

St. Louis, MO · ~184 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Passenger air transportation, scheduled workplace, earning a grade A.

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar: 1.9 TCR = 43% of Passenger air transportation, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar safety composite

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar: 0.4 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.79× in 2018

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.4 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 43% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #8/37
  • PHOTO Delta Air Lines - ONT
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~184 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delta Air Lines - ONT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar averages 1.9 TCR (43% of the Passenger air transportation, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2018=3.5 · BLS 4.5

Where 1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar falls in its industry

1,568 Passenger air transportation, establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 37 Passenger air transportation, employers in Missouri.

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar (184 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar
1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar (184 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

1004-16 Trans States STL Maint Hangar has more employees than the Passenger air transportation, scheduled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.5 3.5 8 0 0
2016 0.4 0.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · MO · St. Louis

1,568 Passenger air transportation, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Delta Air Lines - ONT 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Endeavor Air, Inc. - ATL Tech Ops 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 76210002--HOU UNITED/CONT GUARDS 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Air Lines - JAX 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4CL - MO MGO Gas 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millstone Weber, LLC. - Total Company 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tnemec Company NKC 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Variform Kearney Plant 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR CSH Warehouse Site 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR thyssenkrupp Industrial Services - Danville 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ITG Brands, LLC Danville Tobacco Warehouse Facility 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR South Shore Nursing and Rehab 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Omaha - 70-01 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE thyssenkrupp Industrial Services - Toledo 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE OPC Greater Orlando Marketing 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coventry Center 184 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.