Automotive parts and supply stores · Texas

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent

Coppell, TX · ~118 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent runs at 386% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automotive parts and supply stores workplace, earning a grade F.

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent: 13.1 TCR = 386% of Automotive parts and supply stores BLS 3.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent safety composite

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2019

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent injury rate improved

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent's TCR fell 6.7 from 22.5 in 2016 to 15.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=15.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441310 · Coppell, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 386% of ind

  • DART 15.0 DART
  • RANK #87/89
  • PHOTO PBY CT West Hartford
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PBY CT West Hartford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent averages 13.1 TCR (386% of the Automotive parts and supply stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent TCR series: 2016=22.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=15.8 · BLS 3.4

Where 100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent falls in its industry

1,258 Automotive parts and supply st establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 89 Automotive parts and supply st employers in Texas.

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent (118 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 30 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent
100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent (118 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 30 employees and a TCR of 4.4

100735 - DAL - Dallas Dist Cent has more employees than the Automotive parts and supply stores median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 15.8 15.0 17 2 0
2018 9.8 8.0 11 0 0
2017 4.5 1.8 5 0 0
2016 22.5 10.8 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441310 · TX · Coppell

1,258 Automotive parts and supply stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 192 employers in Coppell, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PBY CT West Hartford 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Youngstown Auto Wrecking 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PBY NJ Audubon 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PBY VA Norfolk 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms Marfa 2 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pintail Alternative Energy, LLC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oncor West DOC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE TYLER SC&TRANS 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Driveline Retail Merchandising 7,570 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 3,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW6 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR 482273-NORTH TEXAS TX P&DC 1,373 FTE
NAT-TCR e4 Control Systems 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR #105 Art Van Petoskey 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR JR Simplot Company-SGS Jerome-Hazelton 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gateway Tire & Service Center-Batesville 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tops 226 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brittain Machine Inc 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-Nai 0034 2771 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alltech Beverage Division 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.