General Warehousing and Storage · Texas

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6

Coppell, TX · ~3,496 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6: 8.2 TCR = 142% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2018→2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6's TCR fell 3.4 from 8.5 in 2018 to 5.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.5 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Coppell, TX ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 8.2 · 142% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #768/846
  • PHOTO Chicago Distribution…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 593 inj
  • SIZE ~3,496 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chicago Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 averages 8.2 TCR (142% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 TCR series: 2018=8.5 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=5.1 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #768 safest of 846 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Texas.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 (3,496 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 (3,496 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.1 4.5 193 6 0
2019 11.1 10.3 241 4 0
2018 8.5 8.1 159 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Coppell

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 192 employers in Coppell, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chicago Distribution Center 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4186-DC201 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WOW 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minooka, IL (BMW) 175 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raytheon_McKinney_TX 3,510 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2020 Companies Corporate 3,471 FTE
STATE-SIZE Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus 3,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR Driveline Retail Merchandising 7,570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW6 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR 482273-NORTH TEXAS TX P&DC 1,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORTH TEXAS_1441182 1,251 FTE
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MIA1 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amzl : Dbo3 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Getchell Brothers - Sanford 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon Transportation Services : CVG9 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Des Moines Methodist Hospital 3,495 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overlook Medical Center 3,494 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pitt County Schools 3,499 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perrigo : Michigan-Allegan (PMI) 3,500 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.