Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings · Massachusetts

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA

Marlborough, MA · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA runs at 393% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings workplace, earning a grade F.

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA: 11.4 TCR = 393% of Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA safety composite

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.6

2016→2022

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA injury rate improved

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA's TCR fell 14.6 from 18.8 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.8 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=16.0 · 2019=17.4 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Marlborough, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 393% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #99/100
  • PHOTO MRJ Constructors LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MRJ Constructors LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1019 - BELFOR Boston MA averages 11.4 TCR (393% of the Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA TCR series: 2016=18.8 · 2017=9.6 · 2018=16 · 2019=17.4 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=4 · 2022=4.2 · BLS 2.9

Where 1019 - BELFOR Boston MA falls in its industry

4,692 Fire and flood restoration of establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #99 safest of 100 Fire and flood restoration of employers in Massachusetts.

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA (30 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 1019 - BELFOR Boston MA
1019 - BELFOR Boston MA (30 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

1019 - BELFOR Boston MA has fewer employees than the Fire and flood restoration of commercial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2021 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 10.1 10.1 3 0 0
2019 17.4 11.6 3 3 0
2018 16.0 16.0 5 0 0
2017 9.6 9.6 3 0 0
2016 18.8 15.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MA · Marlborough

4,692 Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 121 employers in Marlborough, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MRJ Constructors LLC 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bluestone Group Construction 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Katzianer Construction Co., Inc. 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGC Capital Contracting Corp. 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Best Bees Company 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Wareham 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kneeland 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Lagasse Group, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon - Marlborough 2,332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Marlborough_MA 2,054 FTE
CITY-NEAR Field 1,438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hologic : Marlborough Campus 700 FTE
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03477 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hartford-Saint Francis Behavioral Health Group 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Seafood City Supermarket - Eagle Rock 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 359617-Nyc-Peck Slip Sta 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG103 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Concrete Materials - Waynesville Plant 40 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG415 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG829 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.