Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction · California

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project

Huntington Beach, CA · ~201 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction workplace, earning a grade A.

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project safety composite

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project held a steady TCR band

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Huntington Beach, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/147
  • PHOTO 105185 - IPP Repower…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project falls in its industry

1,605 Power plant (except hydroelect establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 147 Power plant (except hydroelect employers in California.

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project (201 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project
103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project (201 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project has more employees than the Power plant (except hydroelectric) const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Huntington Beach

1,605 Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 216 employers in Huntington Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 103258 - Birdsboro Power Project 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LGA Services 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plaza 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harris Ranch Feeding Company 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE MALAGA BUILDING D 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE AM Ortega Construction Inc. 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA FLUID - CITY OF INDUSTRY CA-SOUTH 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA015 2,174 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 389 846 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bolsa 648 FTE
CITY-NEAR 111 - Huntington Beach 572 FTE
NAT-TCR James NoMad 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jabil Corporate and Regional Managing Offices 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR UTC Corporate Office Farmington Campus 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CAP St. George, UT 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Voith Fabrics and Rolls Appleton 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE US-Cleveland 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE PotlatchDeltic: WARREN 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mosites Construction Company 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.