Water system storage tank and tower construction · New York

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab

New York, NY · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Water system storage tank and tower construction workplace, earning a grade A.

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab: 0.6 TCR = 22% of Water system storage tank and tower construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab safety composite

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab held a steady TCR band

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/71
  • PHOTO Future Telecom
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Future Telecom (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab averages 0.6 TCR (22% of the Water system storage tank and tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where 103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab falls in its industry

1,614 Water system storage tank and establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 71 Water system storage tank and employers in New York.

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab (42 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab
103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab (42 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

103517 - Jett - WI281 Settling Tank Rehab has fewer employees than the Water system storage tank and tower cons median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 1.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · NY · New York

1,614 Water system storage tank and tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Future Telecom 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lametti and Sons Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR W.M. Schultz Construction, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Akins Excavating CO 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE W D Henry & Sons Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreher Sunrise Farms LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Cooperative - Ithaca 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE IA Construction Management Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Fci USA LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1915-1900X 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MN House of Representatives 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Think Utility Services, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Famous Dave's - Woodbury 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE HRL - Ground Ops 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE VNA at HCS Peterborough 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Home City Ice Company - Mack - 301 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.