Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · California

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse

Redwood City, CA · ~339 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse: 7.5 TCR = 219% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse safety composite

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse: 5.9 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2022

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse's TCR rose 4.2 from 5.9 in 2017 to 10.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Redwood City, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 219% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #139/156
  • PHOTO 0017 - EUGENE OR WHSE
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 121 inj
  • SIZE ~339 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0017 - EUGENE OR WHSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse averages 7.5 TCR (219% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse TCR series: 2017=5.9 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=10.1 · BLS 3.4

Where 1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 156 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in California.

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse (339 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse
1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse (339 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.1 2.9 28 0 0
2021 9.1 8.8 23 1 1
2020 2.5 2.5 6 1 0
2019 9.3 9.3 26 0 0
2018 7.9 7.9 22 0 0
2017 5.9 5.5 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · CA · Redwood City

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 116 employers in Redwood City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0017 - EUGENE OR WHSE 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0218 - STERLING VA WHSE 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320150 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0783 - EDEN PRAIRIE MN WHSE 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CENTRAL COAST LABOR MANAGEMENT INC 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foothill Fire Protection, Inc 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARDx San Diego Summers Ridge 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE MKS Santa Clara 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 141 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guardant Health 1,513 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120851 1,471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620851 1,382 FTE
NAT-TCR 0017 - Eugene or Whse 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 0218 - Sterling Va Whse 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Regent Bellevue 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Fort Collins 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 4 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adaptec Solutions 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE 840 N Broadway 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tnebr - Memphis 339 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.