Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

Pacific Regent Bellevue

Bellevue, WA · ~118 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Regent Bellevue runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Pacific Regent Bellevue: 7.5 TCR = 196% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Regent Bellevue safety composite

Pacific Regent Bellevue scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.3

2016→2022

Pacific Regent Bellevue injury rate improved

Pacific Regent Bellevue's TCR fell 14.3 from 15.2 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.2 · 2017=11.7 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Bellevue, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 196% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/109
  • PHOTO Maris Grove
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maris Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Regent Bellevue in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Regent Bellevue averages 7.5 TCR (196% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Regent Bellevue TCR series: 2016=15.2 · 2017=11.7 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1 · BLS 3.8

Where Pacific Regent Bellevue falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Pacific Regent Bellevue (118 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Regent Bellevue
Pacific Regent Bellevue (118 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Pacific Regent Bellevue has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 2 0 0
2020 5.1 1.3 4 0 0
2019 4.4 1.1 4 0 0
2018 12.2 7.3 9 1 0
2017 11.7 7.0 10 0 0
2016 15.2 15.2 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Bellevue

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 241 employers in Bellevue, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maris Grove 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Mary's Woods 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Watermark at San Ramon 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azria Health Midtown 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 547 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Concrete Cutting, Inc 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexandria Moulding - Moxee 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olympia Container 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Bellevue 1,697 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bellevue College 1,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA002 1,350 FTE
CITY-NEAR MEYDENBAUER CENTER 863 FTE
NAT-TCR 0017 - Eugene or Whse 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1042 - Redwood City Ca Whse 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 0218 - Sterling Va Whse 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Fort Collins 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE PHS - Interlude Fridley 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE EGM Builders 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZOAL 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.