Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction · Florida

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility

Palatka, FL · ~230 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction workplace, earning a grade A.

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility: 0.1 TCR = 4% of Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility safety composite

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility held a steady TCR band

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Palatka, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/98
  • PHOTO Utility Lines Constr…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~230 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility averages 0.1 TCR (4% of the Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where 104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility falls in its industry

1,605 Power plant (except hydroelect establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 98 Power plant (except hydroelect employers in Florida.

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility (230 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility
104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility (230 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility has more employees than the Power plant (except hydroelectric) const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · FL · Palatka

1,605 Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 59 employers in Palatka, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105285 - Champlain Hudson Power Express-Transmiss 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105308 - Magnolia Power 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Power Services - Exelon, Nine Mile Point 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MAR Contracting 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4210_8302 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Label Co. 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tuuci 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR FL180 Palatka Paper 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR PALATKA CENTER FOR REHAB & HEALING 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR HH-PALATHME 560 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Putnam Hospital 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Equistar Chemicals, Bayport 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomson Reuters - Carrollton 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MassDEP Boston 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Ridge Medical Management Corporation - Va 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waymo Chandler 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Class Vending 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unico, LLC 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armor Metal 230 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.