Transmission and distribution line construction · Louisiana

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112

Reserve, LA · ~273 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Transmission and distribution line construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112: 0.1 TCR = 4% of Transmission and distribution line construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 safety composite

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 held a steady TCR band

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Reserve, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/17
  • PHOTO 104290 - Seminole Co…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~273 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 averages 0.1 TCR (4% of the Transmission and distribution line construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 TCR series: 2017=0.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 falls in its industry

1,605 Transmission and distribution establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 17 Transmission and distribution employers in Louisiana.

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 (273 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Utility Lines Construction Services - 112
Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 (273 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Utility Lines Construction Services - 112 has more employees than the Transmission and distribution line const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.3 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · LA · Reserve

1,605 Transmission and distribution line construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 30 employers in Reserve, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 104290 - Seminole Combined-Cycle Facility 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105285 - Champlain Hudson Power Express-Transmiss 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105308 - Magnolia Power 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Power Services - Exelon, Nine Mile Point 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE DELHI LA 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baton Rouge Water Company 274 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1161-BASF Geismar 272 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frischhertz Electric Co., Inc. 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR River Parish Contractors, Inc. 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Well Logging 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR LA002 - LA-New Orleans-Operating Center 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cargill, Inc 125 FTE
NAT-TCR Hamilton Sundstrand de Puerto Rico, Inc 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SCBGILDD 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CPGRMOEO 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Admiral Kidd Community Center 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Veeder-Root (Altoona) 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ti Group Automotive Systems Cartersville 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE 00-TTCO-BIRMINGHAM 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASMO Michigan 273 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.