Light rail system construction · Arizona

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR

Phoenix, AZ · ~58 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Light rail system construction workplace, earning a grade C.

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Light rail system construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR safety composite

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR held a steady TCR band

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/9
  • PHOTO The Goettle Company
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Goettle Company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Light rail system construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where 104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR falls in its industry

932 Light rail system construction establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 9 Light rail system construction employers in Arizona.

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR (58 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR
104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR (58 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

104584 - Northwest Ph.2 LRT Extension - CMAR has fewer employees than the Light rail system construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · AZ · Phoenix

932 Light rail system construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Goettle Company 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turner at Sasol North America Westlake LA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olin Corporation Freeport TX 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Constructors, Inc. 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Redhawk Power Plant 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Renaissance Companies 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE DSQ 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diversified Interiors Arizona 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Springhill Suites Houston Intercontinental AP 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 00525 North Temple Office 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR FXI, Inc. - Corporate Office 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burrow Global Services, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Stephen IGA #658 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schaefer Equipment 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE KJ's Market #654 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE 341-NiSource-Vint Hill VA 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.