Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers · Pennsylvania

105 - Philadelphia Fas

Conshohocken, PA · ~51 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

105 - Philadelphia Fas runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

105 - Philadelphia Fas: 0.7 TCR = 32% of Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

105 - Philadelphia Fas safety composite

105 - Philadelphia Fas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

105 - Philadelphia Fas: 1.4 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

105 - Philadelphia Fas's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.4 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423450 · Conshohocken, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/43
  • PHOTO Stryker Wright - Blo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stryker Wright - Bloomington, MN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

105 - Philadelphia Fas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 105 - Philadelphia Fas averages 0.7 TCR (32% of the Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

105 - Philadelphia Fas TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 2.2

Where 105 - Philadelphia Fas falls in its industry

754 Professional and commercial eq establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 43 Professional and commercial eq employers in Pennsylvania.

105 - Philadelphia Fas (51 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 105 - Philadelphia Fas
105 - Philadelphia Fas (51 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0

105 - Philadelphia Fas has fewer employees than the Professional and commercial equipment an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423450 · PA · Conshohocken

754 Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 63 employers in Conshohocken, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stryker Wright - Bloomington, MN 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3495-11DG090 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chanhassen Office 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stryker-JR Runnemede NJ 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Regulated Fossil Support 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE EUD Empire 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mechanicsburg 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allentown Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4016-80718107 7,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IKEA US Service Office 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miller Bros 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharp Conshohocken 419 FTE
NAT-TCR 542 - Lake Charles 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 619 - Conroe 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NGMS-T340 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NGMS-Q953 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 260 - Myrtle Beach 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Sebastian River Es 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Bossier City 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Hatchery 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.