Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) · Pennsylvania

Sharp Conshohocken

Conshohocken, PA · ~419 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sharp Conshohocken runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Sharp Conshohocken: 1.3 TCR = 49% of Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sharp Conshohocken safety composite

Sharp Conshohocken scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sharp Conshohocken: 0.8 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2024

Sharp Conshohocken's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.8 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Conshohocken, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 49% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #14/24
  • PHOTO Thermo Fisher Scient…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~419 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thermo Fisher Scientific AL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sharp Conshohocken in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sharp Conshohocken averages 1.3 TCR (49% of the Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sharp Conshohocken TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.6

Where Sharp Conshohocken falls in its industry

228 Packaging services (except pac establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 24 Packaging services (except pac employers in Pennsylvania.

Sharp Conshohocken (419 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sharp Conshohocken
Sharp Conshohocken (419 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Sharp Conshohocken has more employees than the Packaging services (except packing and c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.0 7 0 0
2023 1.4 1.0 7 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 8 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 5 0 0
2020 2.0 1.6 8 2 0
2019 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2018 1.5 1.3 8 0 0
2017 0.9 0.7 4 0 0
2016 0.8 0.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · PA · Conshohocken

228 Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 63 employers in Conshohocken, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific AL 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Synergetics, Inc. (Stow) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NPS 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nittany Oil Co. Inc 419 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Dickson City 076 419 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2255 419 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Box Services Company-PA 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4016-80718107 7,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IKEA US Service Office 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miller Bros 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jacobs Telecommunications 372 FTE
NAT-TCR Caddock Electronics, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Douglasville Store #1707 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rutherfordton 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Progressive Electric, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 81 419 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro East Industries, Inc. 419 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Accessories Company 419 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dubuque Human Services 419 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.