Mail and Parcel Delivery · Georgia

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx

Atlanta, GA · ~56 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx: 10.8 TCR = 240% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx safety composite

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2022

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx injury rate improved

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx's TCR fell 3.1 from 14.8 in 2017 to 11.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.8 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=12.8 · 2022=11.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 240% of ind

  • DART 11.7 DART
  • RANK #367/411
  • PHOTO BRISTOL_1355897
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BRISTOL_1355897 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx averages 10.8 TCR (240% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx TCR series: 2017=14.8 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=12.8 · 2022=11.7 · BLS 4.5

Where 120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #367 safest of 411 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Georgia.

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx (56 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx
120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx (56 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

120458-Atl-Central City Carrier Anx has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.7 11.7 4 2 0
2021 12.8 7.3 7 0 0
2020 7.5 7.5 3 1 0
2019 5.7 1.9 2 1 0
2018 12.2 10.4 7 0 0
2017 14.8 14.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · GA · Atlanta

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BRISTOL_1355897 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MASSAPEQUA PARK_1372111 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MARCUS HOOK_1371809 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 128273-STM-MOUNTAIN PARK STA 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Live Production Offices 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shimizu North America LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE T D Farrell 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRA Constructors, Inc. 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR 119661-Whn-Florence Villa Sta 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 210632-Btr-Scotlandville Sta 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-02631 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 547141-Ric-West Richland Sta 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 118145-Saint Augustine Po 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 115860-Mia-Allapattah Sta 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 115900-Mia-Kendall Carrier Annex 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 518556-Staunton Po 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.