Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Washington

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse

Redmond, WA · ~333 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse runs at 280% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse: 9.5 TCR = 280% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse safety composite

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2017→2022

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse injury rate improved

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse's TCR fell 5.0 from 9.6 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.6 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Redmond, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 280% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #111/120
  • PHOTO 0654 - SOUTH SAN FRA…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 142 inj
  • SIZE ~333 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0654 - SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA BUS CTR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1225 - Redmond Wa Whse averages 9.5 TCR (280% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=4.6 · BLS 3.4

Where 1225 - Redmond Wa Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 120 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Washington.

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse (333 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 1225 - Redmond Wa Whse
1225 - Redmond Wa Whse (333 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

1225 - Redmond Wa Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.6 4.3 12 0 0
2021 9.2 8.0 23 0 0
2020 11.6 8.9 30 0 0
2019 12.7 9.9 32 0 0
2018 9.3 7.7 23 0 0
2017 9.6 7.8 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · WA · Redmond

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 216 employers in Redmond, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0654 - SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA BUS CTR 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0745 - KALISPELL MT WHSE 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0767 - FIFE WA BUS CTR 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320369 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE C75 333 FTE
STATE-SIZE Platinum Nine Holdings, LLC dba Northwest Ambulance 333 FTE
STATE-SIZE MMP ORCHARDS LLC 332 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grant County PUD#2 - Administration 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOA Redmond Campus 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond, WA 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDMOND (WARED) 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR WARED - REDMOND 911 FTE
NAT-TCR PHS - Norris Square 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZNIN 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Plating and Machine Inc 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Snell Farm 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0464 - South Sacramento Ca Whse 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0473 - Chino Hills Ca Whse 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0412 - Azusa Ca Whse 333 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.