Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · California

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse

San Francisco, CA · ~333 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse: 6.8 TCR = 199% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse safety composite

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse: 3.5 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2022

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse's TCR rose 6.5 from 3.5 in 2017 to 10.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 199% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #123/156
  • PHOTO 25320306 MIDDLETOWN,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~333 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 25320306 MIDDLETOWN, RI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse averages 6.8 TCR (199% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=10.1 · BLS 3.4

Where 0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #123 safest of 156 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in California.

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse (333 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse
0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse (333 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0422 - South San Francisco Ca Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.1 6.5 25 0 0
2021 7.5 6.2 17 1 0
2020 4.3 4.3 11 0 0
2019 5.1 5.1 13 0 0
2018 10.1 10.1 25 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · CA · San Francisco

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 25320306 MIDDLETOWN, RI 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320074 MAYS LANDING, NJ 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00605 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320052 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chavez Farm Labor Contractor, Inc. 333 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Inland 333 FTE
STATE-SIZE KDC Inc. Los Alamitos 333 FTE
STATE-SIZE 67680038-1190 LOUIS VUITTON US MFG-LOUIS VUITTON US MFG 1 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR 044/St Louis 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Town Hall 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1580 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR APP Tacoma 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1225 - Redmond Wa Whse 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Williamsport 078 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Owings Mills 125 333 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thirty-One Gifts Distribution Center 333 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.