Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers · Maryland

14 - Baltimore Fas

Jessup, MD · ~68 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

14 - Baltimore Fas runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

14 - Baltimore Fas: 0.4 TCR = 16% of Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

14 - Baltimore Fas safety composite

14 - Baltimore Fas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

14 - Baltimore Fas injury rate improved

14 - Baltimore Fas's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423450 · Jessup, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Owens & Minor Tracy
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Owens & Minor Tracy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

14 - Baltimore Fas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 14 - Baltimore Fas averages 0.4 TCR (16% of the Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

14 - Baltimore Fas TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where 14 - Baltimore Fas falls in its industry

754 Professional and commercial eq establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Professional and commercial eq employers in Maryland.

14 - Baltimore Fas (68 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 14 - Baltimore Fas
14 - Baltimore Fas (68 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0

14 - Baltimore Fas has more employees than the Professional and commercial equipment an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423450 · MD · Jessup

754 Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 122 employers in Jessup, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Owens & Minor Tracy 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TWINMED, LLC - INDY 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medtronic Diabetes Commercial 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patterson Corporate Headquarters 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pumphrey Training Center 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Humphrey Rich Construction Group, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gradeline Construction Company, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE JES Baltimore 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster Foods 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jessup Correctional Institution 530 FTE
CITY-NEAR RNDC Jessup 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Baltimore, LLC 491 FTE
NAT-TCR 44 - Scranton Dc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AbbVie Cambridge Research Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ORBIS Troy 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anderson Insulation of Abington 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 935 - Erlanger 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michael Lewis Company - West 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black & McDonald - Vancouver 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.