Food Service Contractors · Indiana

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining

North Manchester, IN · ~125 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining safety composite

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · North Manchester, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/168
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT DCPS CLUST…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT DCPS CLUSTER 7 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining TCR series: 2019=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 168 Food Service Contractors employers in Indiana.

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining (125 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining
Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining (125 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Manchester Univ Haist Dining has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · IN · North Manchester

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 28 employers in North Manchester, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT DCPS CLUSTER 7 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WF ST LOUIS CAFES 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Johnsbury Academy 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT OAS AT SUNY ONEONTAWILLSBACH 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Premier Energy Services 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE COMMERCIAL SERVICE OF BLOOMINGTON INC 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Container 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas Group of America 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Church of the Brethren Home, INC dba Timbercrest Senior Living Community 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester Metals, Inc 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Strauss Veal Feeds, Inc. 109 FTE
NAT-TCR 14 - Baltimore Fas 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 44 - Scranton Dc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ORBIS Troy 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AbbVie Cambridge Research Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE KPI Concepts- Plant #1 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Custom Distribution - FON 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE 211 - Mobile 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Community Based Clients 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.