Support Activities for Air Transportation · Alabama

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs

Fort Rucker, AL · ~3,878 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade A.

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs: 1.6 TCR = 35% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs safety composite

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2020→2024

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs injury rate improved

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.9 in 2020 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.9 · 2021=1.4 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Fort Rucker, AL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO SFO-FFM
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 246 inj
  • SIZE ~3,878 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SFO-FFM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs averages 1.6 TCR (35% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs TCR series: 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.4 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 4.5

Where 151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs falls in its industry

992 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Alabama.

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs (3,878 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs
151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs (3,878 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs has more employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.9 47 0 0
2023 1.8 1.4 74 0 0
2021 1.4 1.0 54 0 0
2020 1.9 1.6 71 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · AL · Fort Rucker

992 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 8 employers in Fort Rucker, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SFO-FFM 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAWS CHINA LAKE, CA VX-9 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Davcor Aviation Services Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFS Chicago Executive-269PWK 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - BHM1 4,102 FTE
STATE-SIZE 151 - FORT RUCKER AV MX SVS 3,650 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC 3,611 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mazda Toyota Manufacturing USA Inc 4,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Rucker Facilities Support Services 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHG Army Hotels - Fort Rucker (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging) 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHG Army Hotels - Fort Novosel (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging) 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ft Rucker 01F 46 FTE
NAT-TCR Des Moines 10536 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Anderson Environmental Contracting, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hancock County Hospital 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens Companies, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lawrence Service LLC 3,881 FTE
NAT-SIZE ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC 3,873 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northfield Corporate 3,883 FTE
NAT-SIZE State of California - 065 3,872 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.