Steel mills · Indiana

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC

Burns Harbor, IN · ~3,873 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Steel mills workplace, earning a grade A.

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Steel mills BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC safety composite

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC: 1.3 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2020

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Burns Harbor, IN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #13/42
  • PHOTO Levy Environmental S…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 203 inj
  • SIZE ~3,873 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Levy Environmental Services Company dba Levy Texas Mill Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Steel mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC falls in its industry

416 Steel mills establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 42 Steel mills employers in Indiana.

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC (3,873 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC
ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC (3,873 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC has more employees than the Steel mills median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.8 1.4 31 41 0
2019 0.9 0.2 40 3 0
2018 1.1 0.3 50 0 0
2017 0.9 0.3 37 1 0
2016 1.3 0.4 45 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · IN · Burns Harbor

416 Steel mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 18 employers in Burns Harbor, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Levy Environmental Services Company dba Levy Texas Mill Services 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Steel South Carolina 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR USS Gary Works - Plant 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Triangle Mill Service LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riley Hospital for Children 3,883 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1855-ININD257 3,850 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor 3,844 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4.63E+17 3,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor 4,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Corporate - Burns Harbor 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Corporate - Burns Harbor (EIN 710871875) 238 FTE
NAT-TCR Dan E Karn 1&2 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherokee Station 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Specialty Contractors - Branch 049 - Houston, TX 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : BMI - Bloomington 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE State of California - 065 3,872 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center 3,869 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Peter's Hospital- Albany 3,868 FTE
NAT-SIZE 151 - Fort Rucker Av Mx Svs 3,878 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.