SUPERMARKETS AND OTHER GROCERY (EXCEPT CONVENIENCE STORES) · Minnesota

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134)

Rochester, MN · ~96 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical SUPERMARKETS AND OTHER GROCERY (EXCEPT CONVENIENCE STORES) workplace, earning a grade B.

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134): 2.4 TCR = 69% of SUPERMARKETS AND OTHER GROCERY (EXCEPT CONVENIENCE STORES) BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) safety composite

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134): 1.6 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2018

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134)'s TCR rose 1.5 from 1.6 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Rochester, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 69% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #28/327
  • PHOTO Store 1728
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Store 1728 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) averages 2.4 TCR (69% of the SUPERMARKETS AND OTHER GROCERY (EXCEPT CONVENIENCE STORES) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=3.1 · BLS 3.4

Where 1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) falls in its industry

30,654 SUPERMARKETS AND OTHER GROCERY establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 327 SUPERMARKETS AND OTHER GROCERY employers in Minnesota.

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) (96 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134)
1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) (96 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

1602 Cub Foods-Rochester (Sv 030134) has fewer employees than the SUPERMARKETS AND OTHER GROCERY (EXCEPT C median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · MN · Rochester

30,654 SUPERMARKETS AND OTHER GROCERY (EXCEPT CONVENIENCE STORES) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Store 1728 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luckys 20 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 3143 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6400-SWY 0017 1474 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rosetta, LLC 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE WARRIOR MFG., LLC-HUTCHINSON, MN 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blaine Brothers 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Princeton Intermediate School 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Town of Chapel Hill - Planning and Sustainability 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Badger Meter Racine 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Plus - 0500 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodrich ES - Atlantic Inertial Systems 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Senior Care of Corpus Christi 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trisun Care Center Lakeside 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conrad Aluminum Shipyard 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belmont Village West Lake Hills 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.