General medical and surgical hospitals · Minnesota

Mayo Clinic Rochester

Rochester, MN · ~38,233 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayo Clinic Rochester runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade A.

Mayo Clinic Rochester: 3.2 TCR = 43% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayo Clinic Rochester safety composite

Mayo Clinic Rochester scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mayo Clinic Rochester held a steady TCR band

Mayo Clinic Rochester's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.3 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Rochester, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 3.2 · 43% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #57/249
  • PHOTO Menomonie
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6,774 inj
  • SIZE ~38,233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Menomonie (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mayo Clinic Rochester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayo Clinic Rochester averages 3.2 TCR (43% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayo Clinic Rochester TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 7.5

Where Mayo Clinic Rochester falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 249 General medical and surgical h employers in Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Rochester (38,233 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 010,00020,00030,00040,00050,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayo Clinic Rochester
Mayo Clinic Rochester (38,233 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Mayo Clinic Rochester has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.2 1.0 1,067 47 0
2022 3.0 1.0 930 68 0
2021 3.3 1.1 1,009 62 0
2020 3.2 1.2 900 108 0
2019 3.2 0.9 971 30 0
2018 3.2 1.1 958 54 0
2017 3.3 1.1 939 27 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MN · Rochester

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Menomonie 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 155 Lakeside Womens Center of OKC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaleida Health DeGraff Memorial Hospital 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AK13 PROVIDENCE CANCER CENTER-ANCHORAGE HR 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3M Center 15,771 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Medical Labs/Mayo Collaborative Services 776 FTE
NAT-TCR HEA - Homer 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tarkio 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR T & T Manufacturing, LLC. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TOCKWOTTON/WATERFRONT 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
NAT-SIZE UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
NAT-SIZE UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6017-Corp Loc - USA United States - Scv 31,225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.