Mail and Parcel Delivery · Illinois

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta

Chicago, IL · ~122 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta runs at 330% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta: 14.8 TCR = 330% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta safety composite

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2022

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta injury rate improved

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta's TCR fell 2.6 from 17.3 in 2017 to 14.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.3 · 2018=18.5 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=12.7 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=14.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 330% of ind

  • DART 14.8 DART
  • RANK #542/599
  • PHOTO SUNNYSIDE_1384003
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 88 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SUNNYSIDE_1384003 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta averages 14.8 TCR (330% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta TCR series: 2017=17.3 · 2018=18.5 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=12.7 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=14.8 · BLS 4.5

Where 161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #542 safest of 599 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Illinois.

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta (122 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta
161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta (122 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.8 14.8 7 9 0
2021 11.3 11.3 12 1 0
2020 12.7 12.7 13 0 0
2019 14.5 14.5 16 0 0
2018 18.5 18.5 20 1 0
2017 17.3 17.3 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · IL · Chicago

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SUNNYSIDE_1384003 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR INDUSTRIAL_1367929 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEL MAR_1360557 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCCF EAST_1384192 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE NG Glenwood Reporting Center 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cabot Corporation Tuscola 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE US IL Moline Plant 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02089 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gelson's Markets #16 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pressure Treating Facility 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Strandberg Construction 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 216051-Metairie Po 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE 568640-Waukesha Po 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE 253920-Grand Rapids Po 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE 483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.