Mail and Parcel Delivery · Texas

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch

Fort Worth, TX · ~122 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch: 10.9 TCR = 242% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch safety composite

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2017→2022

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch injury rate improved

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch's TCR fell 6.3 from 15.4 in 2017 to 9.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.4 · 2018=14.0 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 242% of ind

  • DART 9.1 DART
  • RANK #830/959
  • PHOTO NORTHVILLE_1375563
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NORTHVILLE_1375563 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch averages 10.9 TCR (242% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch TCR series: 2017=15.4 · 2018=14 · 2021=5 · 2022=9.1 · BLS 4.5

Where 483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #830 safest of 959 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Texas.

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch (122 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch
483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch (122 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

483237-Fwt-No Richland Hills Branch has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.1 9.1 5 6 0
2021 5.0 4.2 6 0 0
2018 14.0 14.0 15 1 0
2017 15.4 15.4 16 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · TX · Fort Worth

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NORTHVILLE_1375563 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WESTLAND_1387311 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR EVANSTON_1362845 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 259380-TROY PO 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Iron Horse Tools, Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Benito SC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Operations Center-119 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amarillo Technical Center-122 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR 287534-Spr-Greisemer Carrier Anx 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 259380-Troy Po 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0045-0045-08131 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00140 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 216051-Metairie Po 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE 161511-Chi-Daniel J Doffyn Sta 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE 160505-Bat-Hanover Park Carrier Anx 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE 038270-Sun-Surprise Br 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.