Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Wisconsin

1848 Construction, Inc.

Madison, WI · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1848 Construction, Inc. runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

1848 Construction, Inc.: 5.0 TCR = 174% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1848 Construction, Inc. safety composite

1848 Construction, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2020→2021

1848 Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

1848 Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 10.1 from 10.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Madison, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 174% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #84/149
  • PHOTO Stewart Richey Const…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stewart Richey Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

1848 Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1848 Construction, Inc. averages 5.0 TCR (174% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1848 Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2020=10.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.9

Where 1848 Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 149 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Wisconsin.

1848 Construction, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate 1848 Construction, Inc.
1848 Construction, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

1848 Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.1 5.1 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · WI · Madison

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stewart Richey Construction, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR C2 Building Group 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1015 - BELFOR Seattle WA 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alsum Farms Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FGI West Salem 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 760 Durand Agronomy 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 764 Osseo Agronomy 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR VA-Portsmouth 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR InterChange Group, Inc. Cold Storage Warehouse 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-40426) 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DuPage High School District 88 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Madrid Coating operations 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faribault Feed Mill 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE County of Maui,Parks,Golf Course 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryder System, Inc. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.