Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan

Sheboygan, WI · ~20 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan runs at 499% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan: 19.0 TCR = 499% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan safety composite

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan: 11.5 → 25.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 25.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.36× in 2021

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan's TCR rose 14.4 from 11.5 in 2016 to 25.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sheboygan, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.0 · 499% of ind

  • DART 25.9 DART
  • RANK #264/273
  • PHOTO Camellia Place
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Camellia Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan averages 19.0 TCR (499% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2018=12.7 · 2020=25.9 · 2021=25.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #264 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan (20 employees, TCR 19.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan
Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan (20 employees, TCR 19.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Azura Memory Care of Sheboygan has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 25.9 25.9 3 0 0
2020 25.9 25.9 3 0 0
2018 12.7 6.4 2 0 0
2016 11.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Sheboygan

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 138 employers in Sheboygan, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Camellia Place 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living Bonita Springs 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rancho Park 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Elmhurst 19.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alsum Farms Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FGI West Salem 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 760 Durand Agronomy 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 764 Osseo Agronomy 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kohler Power Systems 1,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kohler Energy Mosel 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Sheboygan Memorial Medical Center 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheboygan 893 FTE
NAT-TCR 6458-ZKNO 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clear Creek Care Center 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Honolulu Disposal Service, Inc. 19.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Savannah Grand of West Monroe 19.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbia Construction Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE County of Maui,Parks,Golf Course 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Madrid Coating operations 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fragra*Matics 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.