Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · New York

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp

Utica, NY · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp: 9.7 TCR = 256% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp safety composite

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp: 13.3 → 14.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 70.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2023

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp's TCR rose 1.5 from 13.3 in 2016 to 14.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 70.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Utica, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 256% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #228/336
  • PHOTO 1021
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1021 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp averages 9.7 TCR (256% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp TCR series: 2016=13.3 · 2017=11.6 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=70.4 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=15.4 · 2023=14.8 · BLS 3.8

Where 2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #228 safest of 336 Group homes, intellectual and employers in New York.

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp (33 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp
2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp (33 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

2001-Ucpmc-Gildersleeve Crp has fewer employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.8 9.9 3 0 0
2022 15.4 15.4 3 0 0
2021 0.4 0.3 4 0 0
2020 70.4 42.2 5 0 0
2019 6.5 3.3 2 0 0
2018 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2017 11.6 8.7 4 0 0
2016 13.3 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Utica

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1021 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AYA COPPER CANYON/DESERT POINT 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4263-NH-DEPAUL 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chili Ave. ICF 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Donald DeMarree Fruit Farm, inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillcrest Holsteins, LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Royal-J-Acres, LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCollum Farms, Inc 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resource Center for Independent Living 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faxton St. Lukes 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Medical Center 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utica University 915 FTE
NAT-TCR American Red Cross - 6230 Claremont Ave 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cisne RHCC 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Suites at Someren Glen 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-FL-Orlando-Parkline Blvd 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE McDonough, GA (Mazda) 113 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Aviation - BCT 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 104 - Gainesville 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Popcorn Inc 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.