Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Maryland

2017116 - Purple Line OMF

Landover Hills, MD · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2017116 - Purple Line OMF runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

2017116 - Purple Line OMF: 1.0 TCR = 35% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2017116 - Purple Line OMF safety composite

2017116 - Purple Line OMF scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2019→2020

2017116 - Purple Line OMF injury rate improved

2017116 - Purple Line OMF's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Landover Hills, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/99
  • PHOTO HL Restoration
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HL Restoration (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

2017116 - Purple Line OMF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2017116 - Purple Line OMF averages 1.0 TCR (35% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2017116 - Purple Line OMF TCR series: 2019=2 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.9

Where 2017116 - Purple Line OMF falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 99 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Maryland.

2017116 - Purple Line OMF (34 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate 2017116 - Purple Line OMF
2017116 - Purple Line OMF (34 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

2017116 - Purple Line OMF has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Landover Hills

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 10 employers in Landover Hills, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HL Restoration 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webb Construction Group, Inc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PJ Hayes Inc. dba Tandem Construction 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookfield Office 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FOXBOROUGH NURSERY, INC. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE WGL MD - Frederick 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE FMS Construction - Maryland 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insituform Technologies LLC - Baltimore 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5129 389 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5129 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5119 Cherry Hill 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAPITAL PLAZA, LANDOVER MD 50 FTE
NAT-TCR A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cleveland Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HDS-Lexington 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pelham, AL CS Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-1515 Burnt Mill Rd 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Forsman Farms SH 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preyde One, LLC. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE TENMET 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wesco - Haas Group International Atlanta Distribution Center 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.