Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · New York

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira

Utica, NY · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade C.

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira: 3.1 TCR = 83% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira safety composite

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2023

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira injury rate improved

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira's TCR fell 1.7 from 8.7 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=7.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Utica, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 83% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #71/336
  • PHOTO CLP - Montello
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLP - Montello (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira averages 3.1 TCR (83% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=7 · BLS 3.8

Where 2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 336 Group homes, intellectual and employers in New York.

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira (25 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira
2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira (25 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

2018-Ucpmc-Szczygiel Ira has fewer employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.0 7.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2016 8.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Utica

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CLP - Montello 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR H401-AHV-COMHAB/HR RESHV/SEMP/Admin Bldg/Res Admin 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEFIANCE FACILITY 1 DEFIANCE FACILITY 1 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tall Pines 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 242 Madava New York 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood dairy Farm LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scipio Springs Dairy 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resource Center for Independent Living 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faxton St. Lukes 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Medical Center 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utica University 915 FTE
NAT-TCR Siena Heights Univ* 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lurie Children's Hosp EVS 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1507-Mntc-Mpls - Grace Manor 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Walvoil Fluid Power Corp 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 3681 Renee Dr 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Odessa, Tx #00065 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hialeah, Fl #00346 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newport News Hospice 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.