Other Direct Selling Establishments · Illinois

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch

Chicago, IL · ~43 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Other Direct Selling Establishments workplace, earning a grade F.

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch: 7.7 TCR = 225% of Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch safety composite

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch: 1.6 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2021

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch's TCR rose 8.6 from 1.6 in 2016 to 10.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454390 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 225% of ind

  • DART 10.2 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO PLANT 401-FREEHOLD NJ
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PLANT 401-FREEHOLD NJ (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch averages 7.7 TCR (225% of the Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=6 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=10.9 · 2020=11.1 · 2021=10.2 · BLS 3.4

Where 2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch falls in its industry

212 Other Direct Selling Establish establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Other Direct Selling Establish employers in Illinois.

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch (43 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch
2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch (43 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1

2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch has more employees than the Other Direct Selling Establishments median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.2 10.2 1 0 0
2020 11.1 11.1 3 2 0
2019 10.9 7.3 6 0 0
2018 6.1 6.1 4 0 0
2017 6.0 4.5 4 0 0
2016 1.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454390 · IL · Chicago

212 Other Direct Selling Establishments employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PLANT 401-FREEHOLD NJ 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DES MOINES, IA/SE IOWA DISTRICT 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HALL'S COLD STORAGE 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culligan - Brooklyn Park 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Illinois 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stratum Reservoir, LLC - Champaign 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - East St. Louis 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manlove Storage Field 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Ravenwood Lutheran Village NCC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kayline Processing 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SDO - Manchester 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2077-Us Dd Nw El Monte Branch 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2077-Us Dd Nw Orlando Branch 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-OREU 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE C. Tucker Cope & Associates 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.