Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living

Canoga Park, CA · ~69 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living: 7.7 TCR = 201% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living safety composite

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living: 5.3 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living's TCR rose 2.0 from 5.3 in 2018 to 7.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Canoga Park, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 201% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #223/635
  • PHOTO Brookdale Broken Arrow
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Broken Arrow (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living averages 7.7 TCR (201% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living TCR series: 2018=5.3 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #223 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living (69 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living
Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living (69 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Canyon Trails at Topanga Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.3 0.0 4 0 0
2020 10.4 10.4 1 8 0
2018 5.3 3.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Canoga Park

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 68 employers in Canoga Park, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Broken Arrow 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Santa Fe 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HERON CLUB AT PRESTANCIA 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Hagerstown 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolf Enterprises 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terranova Ranch, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayo Shop 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aerojet Rocketdyne - Los Angeles 1,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aerojet Rocketdyne - Canoga Park 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Topanga 503 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Police Department, Topanga Division 262 FTE
NAT-TCR Kayline Processing 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2077-Us Dd Nw Chicago Branch 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ravenwood Lutheran Village NCC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SDO - Manchester 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henry Company Fernley 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenburney Health Care 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matagorda House Healthcare Center 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE HI-MACS Facility 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.