Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merchant Wholesalers · Indiana

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center

Indianapolis, IN · ~89 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center runs at 985% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center: 21.7 TCR = 985% of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center safety composite

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−31.5

2020→2021

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center injury rate improved

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center's TCR fell 31.5 from 37.4 in 2020 to 5.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 37.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=37.4 · 2021=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424480 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.7 · 985% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO Charlie's Produce Ir…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Charlie's Produce Irwindale (0.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center averages 21.7 TCR (985% of the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center TCR series: 2020=37.4 · 2021=5.9 · BLS 2.2

Where 2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center falls in its industry

369 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merc establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merc employers in Indiana.

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center (89 employees, TCR 21.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center
2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center (89 employees, TCR 21.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3

2115 Caito Indiana Distribution Center has more employees than the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merchant Whole median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.9 3.0 10 0 0
2020 37.4 34.6 24 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424480 · IN · Indianapolis

369 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Charlie's Produce Irwindale 22.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Full Circle Seattle Warehouse 23.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Fresh Farms 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mucci Pac USA Ltd. 23.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Indiana Laborers 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harmon Construction 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 10 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE construction - glass/glazing 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR 287193-Stl-Maryville Gardens Sta 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cimarron Labor, LLC 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Salina (Utsal) 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0121 Torrance (Hawthorne) 21.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store #611 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doubletree Columbus Worthington 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Short and Paulk Supply Company 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Syracuse 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.