Automotive lighting fixtures manufacturing · Michigan

3383 Northern Lights

Cedar Springs, MI · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

3383 Northern Lights runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automotive lighting fixtures manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

3383 Northern Lights: 6.2 TCR = 115% of Automotive lighting fixtures manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

3383 Northern Lights safety composite

3383 Northern Lights scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

3383 Northern Lights injury rate improved

3383 Northern Lights's TCR fell 5.0 from 8.3 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=15.1 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336320 · Cedar Springs, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.2 · 115% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #35/36
  • PHOTO KD-Lamp Company
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KD-Lamp Company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

3383 Northern Lights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 3383 Northern Lights averages 6.2 TCR (115% of the Automotive lighting fixtures manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

3383 Northern Lights TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=15.1 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 5.4

Where 3383 Northern Lights falls in its industry

216 Automotive lighting fixtures m establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 36 Automotive lighting fixtures m employers in Michigan.

3383 Northern Lights (43 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 3383 Northern Lights
3383 Northern Lights (43 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9

3383 Northern Lights has fewer employees than the Automotive lighting fixtures manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 15.1 11.3 4 0 0
2020 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.3 2.6 2 0 0
2018 10.4 6.9 6 0 0
2017 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2016 8.3 8.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336320 · MI · Cedar Springs

216 Automotive lighting fixtures manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Cedar Springs, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KD-Lamp Company 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Julian Electric Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wise Harness Solutions 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR APTIV Services US, LLC (Plant 10) 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coldwater 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Battle Creek 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE DUWA 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE THOMAS J MOYLE JR INC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Springs Public Schools-41070 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Springs Public Schools 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR CS Manufacturing 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR 248 - Solon Township MI 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Briner Building Inc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vacation Villas Resort and Spa 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Alltek Energy Systems, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1375 Venice Auto Parts 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guardian Lima LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division 25 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynasty Electric 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.