Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Division 25

Peachtree City, GA · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Division 25 runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Division 25: 1.1 TCR = 50% of Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Division 25 safety composite

Division 25 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Division 25 injury rate improved

Division 25's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423710 · Peachtree City, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/25
  • PHOTO Hamilton
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hamilton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Division 25 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Division 25 averages 1.1 TCR (50% of the Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Division 25 TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Division 25 falls in its industry

449 Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 25 Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, employers in Georgia.

Division 25 (43 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Division 25
Division 25 (43 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Division 25 has fewer employees than the Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, sc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423710 · GA · Peachtree City

449 Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 83 employers in Peachtree City, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hamilton 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimball Midwest - Columbus & Sales 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Builders Supply, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DB Corporate 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vickers Farms 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stephens County Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE B.C.T. Gin Co.,Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant McIntosh (Steam) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Peachtree City (PTCGA) 4,488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. 3,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Service, Inc. 3,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Lighting Peachtree City 843 FTE
NAT-TCR Teknor Apex Tennessee Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Aim Leasing Co. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR FRKSC Frackville Service Center 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AN Richmond 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma City OKC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1375 Venice Auto Parts 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3383 Northern Lights 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guardian Lima LLC 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.