In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Ohio

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards)

Cincinnati, OH · ~226 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards): 1.1 TCR = 32% of In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) safety composite

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2019

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) injury rate improved

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards)'s TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Lonza Walkersville
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~226 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lonza Walkersville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where 3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) falls in its industry

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 In-vitro diagnostic substances employers in Ohio.

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) (226 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate 3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards)
3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) (226 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) has more employees than the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 1.4 4 0 0
2016 1.3 0.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · OH · Cincinnati

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lonza Walkersville 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roche Diagnostics Operations 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR QuidelOrtho Rutherford 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eugene, OR 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Sires, Inc - Ohio 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Company 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kelchner Inc. 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin. OH 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. NJ 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Machine & Tool Co., Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR WH Canon, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yarde Metals, Inc.: New Jersey 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meijer 193 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vinculums Services LLC 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vinculums Services 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vinculums Services LLC 226 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.