Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Indiana

Roche Diagnostics Operations

Indianapolis, IN · ~4,924 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roche Diagnostics Operations runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Roche Diagnostics Operations: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roche Diagnostics Operations safety composite

Roche Diagnostics Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Roche Diagnostics Operations held a steady TCR band

Roche Diagnostics Operations's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.3 in 2018 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK P63
  • PHOTO QuidelOrtho Rutherford
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 366 inj
  • SIZE ~4,924 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QuidelOrtho Rutherford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Roche Diagnostics Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roche Diagnostics Operations averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roche Diagnostics Operations TCR series: 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Roche Diagnostics Operations falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Roche Diagnostics Operations (4,924 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Roche Diagnostics Operations
Roche Diagnostics Operations (4,924 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Roche Diagnostics Operations has more employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.7 48 0 0
2023 1.0 0.7 48 1 0
2022 1.2 0.8 62 0 0
2021 0.9 0.6 42 0 0
2020 1.1 0.7 54 0 0
2019 1.1 0.5 52 0 0
2018 1.3 0.6 60 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · IN · Indianapolis

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QuidelOrtho Rutherford 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eugene, OR 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Surmodics 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fujirebio Diagnostics Inc., Malvern 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center 4,918 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS-IL Inspection & Logistics - Corporate 5,037 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana University Health Healthcare Associates 5,075 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital 5,093 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Transportation : Robesonia - Trans 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Social Vocational Services 278 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bhavi Motel LLC - Pennsylvania 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Chi St Joseph Health Reg Hosp 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Emory University Hospital - EHC 4,931 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. - Poway Campus 4,933 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toledo Hospital 4,912 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milford Proving Ground 4,911 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.