Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential · Massachusetts

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368

Randolph, MA · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential workplace, earning a grade D.

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368: 6.1 TCR = 160% of Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 safety composite

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368: 5.9 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2022

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368's TCR rose 6.5 from 5.9 in 2019 to 12.4 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Randolph, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 160% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #30/52
  • PHOTO Park Place
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Park Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 averages 6.1 TCR (160% of the Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 TCR series: 2019=5.9 · 2020=6 · 2021=0 · 2022=12.4 · BLS 3.8

Where 36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 falls in its industry

1,165 Alcoholism rehabilitation faci establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 52 Alcoholism rehabilitation faci employers in Massachusetts.

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 (21 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368
36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 (21 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

36 Smith Road, Randolph, MA 02368 has fewer employees than the Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (ex median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 12.4 6.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · MA · Randolph

1,165 Alcoholism rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 58 employers in Randolph, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Park Place 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TexasVictoria461 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall Campus Residential 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Competency Restoration Program 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bellingham Energy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Medway Power Plant 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cox Engineering - Randolph 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burke Distributing Co. LLC 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR STACY'S PLANT 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARE ONE AT RANDOLPH 189 FTE
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly #633 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 2073-SW-20730032-MX 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North Central International, Olson & Johnson Marshall 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 545950-North Bend Po 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vagabond Inn Executive-San Francisco Airport Bayfront (SFO) 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kanes Furniture - Naples Store 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kanes Furniture - Port Charlotte Store 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kanes Furniture - East Colonial Store 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.