General Warehousing & Storage · Texas

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot

Garland, TX · ~95 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Warehousing & Storage workplace, earning a grade B.

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot: 4.6 TCR = 80% of General Warehousing & Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot safety composite

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot: 4.3 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.81× in 2023

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot's TCR rose 4.1 from 4.3 in 2021 to 8.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Garland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 8.4 DART
  • RANK #615/846
  • PHOTO NEPW Logistics - Sca…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NEPW Logistics - Scarborough (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot averages 4.6 TCR (80% of the General Warehousing & Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot TCR series: 2021=4.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=8.4 · BLS 5.8

Where 4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing & Storage establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #615 safest of 846 General Warehousing & Storage employers in Texas.

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot (95 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot
4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot (95 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

4016 - Garland Tx Ddc (Costco Logistics) Depot has more employees than the General Warehousing & Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.4 8.4 6 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 4.3 4.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Garland

9,477 General Warehousing & Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 316 employers in Garland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NEPW Logistics - Scarborough 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5832 SEATTLE MDC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-200 NESTLE WAY 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - USD1 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacesetter Homes, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockin R Construction 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsboro Concrete Buildings 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DDA2 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz Comany Garland 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osburn Contractors 933 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit #2919 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Field Operations 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brickham Machining Company 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 030-DET 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1997 - Monroe Township Nj Return Center 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sure Forming Systems Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #911 (ALBERTSONS MARKET) 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE MN Women's Care 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.