Skilled Nursing Facility · Texas

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Cedar Park, TX · ~95 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled Nursing Facility workplace, earning a grade F.

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 15.0 TCR = 230% of Skilled Nursing Facility BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.6

2016→2018

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 15.6 from 22.5 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.5 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cedar Park, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.0 · 230% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #1019/1034
  • PHOTO Tracy Nursing & Reha…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tracy Nursing & Rehabiliation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 15.0 TCR (230% of the Skilled Nursing Facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=22.5 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=6.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1019 safest of 1034 Skilled Nursing Facility employers in Texas.

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (95 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (95 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cottonwood Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled Nursing Facility median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.8 5.1 3 1 0
2017 15.6 15.6 12 0 0
2016 22.5 20.1 17 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Cedar Park

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 94 employers in Cedar Park, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tracy Nursing & Rehabiliation Center 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2252-00000430 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senior Living Management Group, LLC dba Birch Pointe Health and Rehabilitation 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridgeview Health Services 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacesetter Homes, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockin R Construction 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsboro Concrete Buildings 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Park Regional Medical Center 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2991 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2991 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2342 - Cedar Park 306 FTE
NAT-TCR Harbor Pest - All 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Suiza Dairy Corporation Aguadilla 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dunn Utility Products 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Food 4 Less - Paso Robles 15.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE STCFField 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 343 - Louisville 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lendlease Princeton 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE B-X Salem LLC 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.