Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing · Florida

4354 Bradenton Container

Bradenton, FL · ~102 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4354 Bradenton Container runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

4354 Bradenton Container: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4354 Bradenton Container safety composite

4354 Bradenton Container scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

4354 Bradenton Container: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.94× in 2022

4354 Bradenton Container's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2019 to 1.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Bradenton, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #4/28
  • PHOTO Midland Packaging an…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Midland Packaging and Display (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

4354 Bradenton Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4354 Bradenton Container averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4354 Bradenton Container TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where 4354 Bradenton Container falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 28 Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box employers in Florida.

4354 Bradenton Container (102 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate 4354 Bradenton Container
4354 Bradenton Container (102 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

4354 Bradenton Container has more employees than the Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · FL · Bradenton

1,338 Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 259 employers in Bradenton, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Midland Packaging and Display 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Jet Corr), Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurens Container 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Midwest Sheets 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Immokalee Packing 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Florida Electric Cooperative, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Southeast Florida (Coconut Creek) 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structural Building Components LP 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradenton Hospice House 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradenton Office 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradenton Life (Pace) Manatee Srvc Ctr 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians Bradenton 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR 3600 Demopolis Mill 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Walnut Creek 31050 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PUBLIC SERVICE OF NEW MEXICO - San Juan 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Insituform Technologies LLC - Santa Fe Springs 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-04926 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens Corning Roofing Plant 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Augusta Operating - 2103 North Leg Drive 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Community Development Resource Agency 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.